Skip to content

Update OpenSMT to 2.9.0 and include support for proofs in the JNI bindings #479

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 27, 2025

Conversation

daniel-raffler
Copy link
Contributor

Hello everyone,
this PR will update OpenSMT to version 2.9.0 while also adding the method MainSolver.printResolutionProofSMT2 to the JNI bindings in preparation for #458. There are also some minor simplifications to the build process and the binaries for GMP on x86-linux and arm64-linux are now included in the build container and no longer have to be provided by the maintainer when updating the binaries.

@daniel-raffler daniel-raffler requested a review from baierd April 25, 2025 00:01
kfriedberger
kfriedberger previously approved these changes Apr 25, 2025
Copy link
Member

@kfriedberger kfriedberger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, good work.

The commits are clearly structured and the code changes are good.

Personally, I would prefer to not include dependencies like GMP or JDK in the Docker image as they cannot be easily updated or exchanged, but require a rebuild of the image. In this PR, there still is the comand line option to set them, which is nice and a valid solution.

I will test the overall build chain the next days.

This step includes a dependency in the image that would need to be downloaded from developers to compile some solvers or their bindings, such as OpenSMT.
We still require the same basic structure,
such that external dependencies are available in the same directory as the JavaSMT checkout.
@kfriedberger
Copy link
Member

JavaDoc publication fails for several weeks. We will investigate and address this CI issue separately.

The rest looks very good.

@daniel-raffler Thanks for the PR.

@kfriedberger kfriedberger merged commit 85cb944 into master Apr 27, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@daniel-raffler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants