Skip to content

[ENH] Add Typehints to TimeSeriesDataSet to align with pep 585 #1819

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 18, 2025

Conversation

fnhirwa
Copy link
Member

@fnhirwa fnhirwa commented Apr 15, 2025

As it was introduced in pep 585 we can use standard collections as type hints.
part of #1817

@fnhirwa fnhirwa marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2025 17:50
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@e87230b). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1819   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   86.77%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       46           
  Lines           ?     5307           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     4605           
  Misses          ?      702           
  Partials        ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
cpu 86.77% <100.00%> (?)
pytest 86.77% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@fnhirwa fnhirwa merged commit 4cfa1b8 into sktime:main Apr 18, 2025
35 checks passed
PranavBhatP pushed a commit to PranavBhatP/pytorch-forecasting that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant