Linters test 1 #2
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes, including the addition of new JSON configuration files for problem matchers related to the Bandit security linter and the Black code formatter. It modifies the GitHub Actions workflow to enhance integration with these tools. Additionally, it removes the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant API
User->>App: POST /petmarketshare
App->>API: Send JSON payload
API-->>App: Response with data
App->>User: Render pet market share results
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
.github/workflows/linters.yaml (1)
40-40: Add a newline character at the end of the fileThe YAML file is missing a newline character at the end. While this doesn't affect the functionality, it's a best practice to include it for better compatibility and adherence to YAML standards.
Apply this change to add a newline at the end of the file:
echo "::add-matcher::$(pwd)/.github/black-matcher.json" +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 40-40: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
templates/petshoppinglist.html (1)
Discrepancies Found Between Frontend Changes and Backend/Documentation Updates
The
templates/petshoppinglist.htmlfile has been updated with the following changes:
- Default petID changed from
3390to223144.- Maximum purchase price increased from
10,000to1,000,000.However, the verification revealed:
- No corresponding changes in backend logic or related Python files.
- No updates in user documentation (
README.md,requirements.txt).Implications:
- Backend Inconsistencies: The backend may not handle the new
maxPurchasePrice, potentially leading to errors or unintended behavior.- User Confusion: Lack of documentation updates can result in users being unaware of the new default values and price ranges, affecting usability and trust.
Recommendations:
- Update Backend Logic: Ensure that the backend supports the new
maxPurchasePriceandpetIDvalues.- Revise Documentation: Update all relevant documentation to reflect the changes in default values and price ranges.
- Comprehensive Testing: Perform thorough testing to verify that the frontend and backend are in sync and that the system behaves as expected with the new values.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-95: Summary of changes and potential impactsThe changes to this template are minimal but potentially impactful:
- The default petID has been changed from 3390 to 223144.
- The maximum purchase price has been increased from 10,000 to 1,000,000.
While these changes are consistently applied within the template, they may have broader implications:
- The new petID range might affect existing users' familiarity with the system.
- The increased price range could impact backend performance and user behavior.
To ensure these changes are part of a cohesive update:
- Confirm that these changes align with any updates to the backend logic, database, or API.
- Verify that user documentation or help text has been updated to reflect these new values.
- Consider A/B testing or gradual rollout to monitor the impact on user behavior and system performance.
Please run the following script to check for related changes in other parts of the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for recent changes in related files echo "Recent changes in pet-related files:" git diff HEAD~5 HEAD -- $(rg -l "pet|price|shopping" --type python --type html) # Check for any updates to user documentation echo "Recent changes in documentation files:" git diff HEAD~5 HEAD -- $(fd -e md -e txt)Length of output: 587
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for recent changes in related files without specifying file types echo "Occurrences of old maxPurchasePrice (10000):" rg "10000" --type html echo "Occurrences of new maxPurchasePrice (1000000):" rg "1000000" --type html echo "Recent changes in pet-related files:" git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- $(rg -l "pet|price|shopping" --type html) # Check for any updates to user documentation without specifying file types echo "Recent changes in documentation files:" git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- $(fd -e md -e txt)Length of output: 4987
app.py (5)
Line range hint
449-507: Improve error handling in thepetmarketsharerouteWhile the implementation of the
petmarketshareroute is generally correct, the error handling could be improved to provide more specific and helpful error messages to the user.Consider the following suggestions:
- Instead of using a generic error message, provide more specific information about what went wrong (e.g., API connection error, invalid input, etc.).
- Log the specific error details for debugging purposes.
- Consider implementing a custom error page or JSON response for API errors.
Here's an example of how you could improve the error handling:
from flask import jsonify @app.route("/petmarketshare", methods=["GET", "POST"]) def petmarketshare(): if request.method == "GET": return redirect("https://saddlebagexchange.com/wow/pet-marketshare") elif request.method == "POST": try: json_data = { "region": request.form.get("region"), "homeRealmName": request.form.get("homeRealmName"), "minPrice": int(request.form.get("minPrice")), "salesPerDay": int(request.form.get("salesPerDay")), "includeCategories": [], "excludeCategories": [], "sortBy": "estimatedRegionMarketValue", } response = requests.post( f"{api_url}/wow/petmarketshare", headers={"Accept": "application/json"}, json=json_data, ) response.raise_for_status() # Raise an exception for HTTP errors data = response.json() if "data" not in data: raise ValueError("No data found in the API response") # Process the data as before # ... return return_safe_html( render_template( "petmarketshare.html", results=response, fieldnames=fieldnames, len=len ) ) except requests.RequestException as e: logger.error(f"API request failed: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "Failed to connect to the API. Please try again later."}), 503 except ValueError as e: logger.error(f"Invalid data received: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "Invalid data received from the API. Please try again later."}), 500 except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Unexpected error in petmarketshare: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again later."}), 500This implementation provides more specific error messages, logs the actual errors for debugging, and returns appropriate HTTP status codes.
Line range hint
509-571: Consider refactoring common functionality betweenpetmarketshareandpetexportroutesThe
petexportroute shares similar structure and functionality with thepetmarketshareroute. Both routes handle GET and POST requests, construct JSON payloads, make API calls, and process responses. To improve code maintainability and reduce duplication, consider refactoring the common parts into reusable functions.Here's a suggestion for refactoring:
- Create a helper function for making API calls and handling errors:
def make_api_call(endpoint, json_data): try: response = requests.post( f"{api_url}/{endpoint}", headers={"Accept": "application/json"}, json=json_data, ) response.raise_for_status() data = response.json() if "data" not in data: raise ValueError("No data found in the API response") return data["data"] except requests.RequestException as e: logger.error(f"API request failed: {str(e)}") raise except ValueError as e: logger.error(f"Invalid data received: {str(e)}") raise
- Create a decorator for handling deprecated routes:
def deprecated_route(new_url): def decorator(f): @wraps(f) def decorated_function(*args, **kwargs): if request.method == "GET": return redirect(new_url) return f(*args, **kwargs) return decorated_function return decorator
- Refactor the routes to use these helpers:
@app.route("/petmarketshare", methods=["GET", "POST"]) @deprecated_route("https://saddlebagexchange.com/wow/pet-marketshare") def petmarketshare(): if request.method == "POST": json_data = { "region": request.form.get("region"), "homeRealmName": request.form.get("homeRealmName"), "minPrice": int(request.form.get("minPrice")), "salesPerDay": int(request.form.get("salesPerDay")), "includeCategories": [], "excludeCategories": [], "sortBy": "estimatedRegionMarketValue", } try: response = make_api_call("wow/petmarketshare", json_data) # Process response data return return_safe_html(render_template("petmarketshare.html", results=response, fieldnames=fieldnames, len=len)) except Exception as e: return jsonify({"error": str(e)}), 500 @app.route("/petexport", methods=["GET", "POST"]) @deprecated_route("https://saddlebagexchange.com/wow/export-search") def petexport(): if request.method == "POST": json_data = { "region": request.form.get("region"), "itemID": int(request.form.get("itemID")), "populationWP": int(request.form.get("populationWP")), "populationBlizz": int(request.form.get("populationBlizz")), "rankingWP": int(request.form.get("rankingWP")), "minPrice": int(request.form.get("minPrice")), "maxQuantity": int(request.form.get("maxQuantity")), "sortBy": "minPrice", "connectedRealmIDs": {}, } try: response = make_api_call("wow/exportx", json_data) # Process response data return return_safe_html(render_template("petexport.html", results=response, fieldnames=fieldnames, len=len)) except Exception as e: return jsonify({"error": str(e)}), 500This refactoring improves code reusability, centralizes error handling, and makes it easier to maintain and update these routes in the future.
Line range hint
573-654: Improve error handling and refactor data processing inregionundercutrouteThe
regionundercutroute has a few areas that could be improved:
- The JSON parsing of
addonDatacould potentially raise an exception if the data is malformed.- Error handling could be more robust to handle potential exceptions from JSON parsing and API calls.
- There's some duplication in processing the undercuts and not found lists.
Here's a suggested refactoring to address these issues:
import json from flask import jsonify def process_item_list(item_list): for row in item_list: row.pop("connectedRealmId", None) row["realmName"] = row.pop("realmName", "") row["undermineLink"] = row.pop("link", "") return item_list @app.route("/regionundercut", methods=["GET", "POST"]) @deprecated_route("https://saddlebagexchange.com/wow/region-undercut") def regionundercut(): if request.method == "POST": try: addonData = json.loads(request.form.get("addonData")) json_data = { "region": request.form.get("region"), "homeRealmID": int(request.form.get("homeRealmID")), "addonData": addonData, } response = requests.post( f"{api_url}/wow/regionundercut", headers={"Accept": "application/json"}, json=json_data, ) response.raise_for_status() data = response.json() if "undercut_list" not in data or "not_found_list" not in data: raise ValueError("Invalid response structure from API") undercuts = process_item_list(data["undercut_list"]) not_found = process_item_list(data["not_found_list"]) return return_safe_html( render_template( "regionundercut.html", results=undercuts, fieldnames=list(undercuts[0].keys()) if undercuts else [], results_n=not_found, fieldnames_n=list(not_found[0].keys()) if not_found else [], len=len, ) ) except json.JSONDecodeError as e: logger.error(f"Invalid JSON in addonData: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "Invalid addon data provided"}), 400 except requests.RequestException as e: logger.error(f"API request failed: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "Failed to connect to the API. Please try again later."}), 503 except ValueError as e: logger.error(f"Invalid data received: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "Invalid data received from the API. Please try again later."}), 500 except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Unexpected error in regionundercut: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again later."}), 500This refactoring:
- Adds explicit JSON parsing with error handling.
- Improves overall error handling with specific error messages.
- Refactors the duplicate list processing into a separate function.
- Uses a more pythonic way of accessing and removing dictionary items.
- Handles potential KeyError exceptions when accessing response data.
These changes should make the code more robust and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
656-907: Standardize route handling and consider a general refactoring for deprecated routesThe remaining routes (bestdeals, petimport, ffxivsalehistory, ffxiv_scrip_exchange) share similar structures but have some inconsistencies:
- Most routes are marked as deprecated with redirects, but
petimportis not.- Error handling varies across routes and could be more consistent.
- There's significant duplication in the structure of these routes.
Consider the following improvements:
- Mark
petimportas deprecated for consistency:@app.route("/petimport", methods=["GET", "POST"]) @deprecated_route("https://saddlebagexchange.com/wow/pet-import") # Add appropriate URL def petimport(): # ... existing code ...
- Create a general helper function for API calls and error handling:
def api_call_handler(endpoint, json_data, template_name): try: response = requests.post( f"{api_url}/{endpoint}", headers={"Accept": "application/json"}, json=json_data, ) response.raise_for_status() data = response.json() if "data" not in data or len(data["data"]) == 0: raise ValueError("No data found in the API response") results = data["data"] fieldnames = list(results[0].keys()) if results else [] return return_safe_html( render_template( template_name, results=results, fieldnames=fieldnames, len=len, ) ) except requests.RequestException as e: logger.error(f"API request failed: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "Failed to connect to the API. Please try again later."}), 503 except ValueError as e: logger.error(f"Invalid data received: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "Invalid data received from the API. Please try again later."}), 500 except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Unexpected error: {str(e)}") return jsonify({"error": "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again later."}), 500
- Refactor the routes to use this helper function:
@app.route("/bestdeals", methods=["GET", "POST"]) @deprecated_route("https://saddlebagexchange.com/wow/best-deals/recommended") def bestdeals(): if request.method == "POST": json_data = { "region": request.form.get("region"), "type": request.form.get("type"), "discount": int(request.form.get("discount")), "minPrice": int(request.form.get("minPrice")), "salesPerDay": float(request.form.get("salesPerDay")), "item_class": int(request.form.get("item_class")), "item_subclass": -1, } return api_call_handler("wow/bestdeals", json_data, "bestdeals.html") @app.route("/petimport", methods=["GET", "POST"]) @deprecated_route("https://saddlebagexchange.com/wow/pet-import") # Add appropriate URL def petimport(): if request.method == "POST": json_data = { "region": request.form.get("region"), "homeRealmID": int(request.form.get("homeRealmID")), "ROI": int(request.form.get("ROI")), "avgPrice": int(request.form.get("avgPrice")), "maxPurchasePrice": int(request.form.get("maxPurchasePrice")), "profitAmount": int(request.form.get("profitAmount")), "salesPerDay": float(request.form.get("salesPerDay")), "includeCategories": [], "excludeCategories": [], "sortBy": "lowestPrice", "petsOnly": request.form.get("petsOnly") == "True", "connectedRealmIDs": {}, } return api_call_handler("wow/import", json_data, "petimport.html") # Similarly refactor ffxivsalehistory and ffxiv_scrip_exchangeThis refactoring will:
- Standardize error handling across all routes
- Reduce code duplication
- Make it easier to maintain and update these routes in the future
- Ensure consistent behavior for deprecated routes
Remember to adjust the helper function as needed to accommodate any route-specific processing that may be required.
Line range hint
1-907: Overall recommendations for improving the codebaseAfter reviewing the changes in
app.py, here are the main areas that need attention:
Standardize error handling: Implement a consistent approach to error handling across all routes. This includes proper logging, user-friendly error messages, and appropriate HTTP status codes.
Reduce code duplication: Many routes share similar structures for API calls, response processing, and template rendering. Consider creating helper functions or decorators to encapsulate these common patterns.
Consistent deprecation handling: Ensure all deprecated routes are handled consistently, including proper redirects and clear indications of deprecation in the code.
Improve security: Pay attention to potential security issues, particularly when parsing user input or addon data. Always use safe parsing methods and validate input thoroughly.
Refactor for maintainability: Consider breaking down the large
app.pyfile into smaller, more manageable modules. This could involve creating separate files for different groups of routes (e.g., wow_routes.py, ffxiv_routes.py) and a common utilities file for shared functions.To implement these improvements, consider the following approach:
Create a
utils.pyfile for common functions:
- API call handler
- Error handling decorator
- Deprecated route decorator
Separate routes into different files based on their functionality:
wow_routes.pyffxiv_routes.pygeneral_routes.pyIn
app.py, import and register these routes:from routes import wow_routes, ffxiv_routes, general_routes app.register_blueprint(wow_routes.bp) app.register_blueprint(ffxiv_routes.bp) app.register_blueprint(general_routes.bp)
- Implement consistent error handling using a custom error handler:
@app.errorhandler(Exception) def handle_exception(e): # Log the error app.logger.error(f"Unhandled exception: {str(e)}") # Return a user-friendly error response return jsonify({"error": "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again later."}), 500
- Use type hints and docstrings to improve code readability and maintainability.
By implementing these changes, you'll create a more maintainable, secure, and consistent codebase that will be easier to update and extend in the future.
semgrep.config.yaml (12)
2-72: LGTM! Well-structured rule for preventing XSS.The
directly-returned-format-stringrule is comprehensive and addresses an important security concern. It covers various string formatting methods and includes relevant metadata.Consider adding a pattern to catch f-strings with multiple expressions, such as:
- pattern: return f"...{...}...{...}..."This would make the rule even more robust.
74-138: Excellent rule for preventing CSV injection attacks.The
csv-writer-injectionrule effectively addresses a less common but potentially dangerous vulnerability. It's well-documented and provides a clear alternative solution.Consider adding a pattern to catch potential CSV injections in file writing operations, such as:
- pattern: open(..., "w", ...).write(...)This would help catch cases where CSV data is written directly to a file without using the
csvmodule.
186-255: Robust rule for preventing command injection via os.system.The
os-system-injectionrule effectively addresses a critical security vulnerability. It's comprehensive and covers multiple scenarios where user input could be passed toos.system.Consider adding a pattern to catch potential command injections in shell=True subprocess calls, such as:
- pattern: subprocess.run(..., shell=True, ...)This would help catch cases where developers might use
subprocessbut still introduce vulnerabilities throughshell=True.
256-359: Comprehensive rule for preventing path traversal attacks.The
path-traversal-openrule effectively addresses the risk of path traversal vulnerabilities. It's thorough and covers multiple scenarios, including both direct and indirect use of user input inopenfunction calls.Consider adding a pattern to catch potential path traversal in other file operations, such as:
- pattern: os.path.join(..., <... flask.request.$W ...>, ...)This would help catch cases where user input is used in path construction, which might lead to path traversal even if not directly used in
open.
360-430: Well-crafted rule for preventing XSS in manually constructed HTML.The
raw-html-formatrule effectively addresses the risk of XSS in manually constructed HTML strings. It covers multiple string formatting scenarios and provides clear guidance on using templates for safe HTML rendering.Consider adding a pattern to catch potential XSS in JavaScript event handlers, such as:
- pattern: '"<... onclick=\\"..." + ... + "\\"..."'This would help catch cases where user input is inserted into JavaScript event handlers, which is a common XSS vector.
431-504: Excellent rule for preventing SSRF vulnerabilities.The
ssrf-requestsrule effectively addresses the risk of Server-Side Request Forgery. It's comprehensive and covers multiple scenarios where user input could be used in server-side requests using therequestslibrary.Consider adding patterns to catch SSRF vulnerabilities in other HTTP libraries, such as:
- pattern: urllib.request.urlopen(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...) - pattern: aiohttp.ClientSession().get(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...)This would make the rule more robust across different HTTP libraries that developers might use.
505-590: Robust rule for preventing command injection via subprocess.The
subprocess-injectionrule effectively addresses the risk of command injection insubprocesscalls. It uses taint analysis to track user input and covers multiple scenarios, including shell usage.Consider adding a pattern to catch potential command injections in
os.popencalls, such as:- pattern: os.popen(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...)While
os.popenis less common, it's still a potential vector for command injection and including it would make the rule more comprehensive.
591-645: Well-structured rule for preventing SQL injection.The
tainted-sql-stringrule effectively addresses the risk of SQL injection in manually constructed SQL strings. It covers multiple string formatting scenarios and provides clear guidance on using parameterized queries or ORMs.Consider adding patterns to catch SQL injections in specific database libraries, such as:
- pattern: sqlite3.connect(...).execute(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...) - pattern: psycopg2.connect(...).cursor().execute(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...)This would make the rule more robust across different database libraries that developers might use directly.
646-721: Effective rule for preventing SSRF via URL manipulation.The
tainted-url-hostrule effectively addresses the risk of SSRF through manipulation of the host portion in manually constructed URLs. It covers multiple string formatting scenarios and provides clear guidance on using an allowlist for approved hosts.Consider adding a pattern to catch potential SSRF vulnerabilities in URL parsing libraries, such as:
- pattern: urllib.parse.urlparse(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...)This would help catch cases where user input is passed to URL parsing functions, which might be used later in requests.
722-785: Crucial rule for preventing code injection via eval.The
eval-injectionrule effectively addresses the critical risk of code injection through theevalfunction. It covers multiple scenarios where user input could be passed toeval, both directly and indirectly.Consider adding a pattern to catch potential eval-like functions, such as:
- pattern: $FUNC(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...) - metavariable-regex: metavariable: $FUNC regex: ^(eval|exec|compile)$This would make the rule more comprehensive by including other potentially dangerous functions like
execandcompile.
786-849: Important rule for preventing code injection via exec.The
exec-injectionrule effectively addresses the critical risk of code injection through theexecfunction. It covers multiple scenarios where user input could be passed toexec, both directly and indirectly.Consider consolidating this rule with the
eval-injectionrule, as they are very similar and address the same type of vulnerability. You could create a single rule that covers bothevalandexec, like this:- id: code-injection pattern-either: - pattern: eval(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...) - pattern: exec(<... flask.request.$W ...>, ...) message: Detected user data flowing into eval or exec. This is code injection and should be avoided. severity: ERROR ...This would reduce duplication and make the ruleset more maintainable.
Line range hint
1-853: Excellent comprehensive security ruleset for Flask applications.This Semgrep configuration file contains a well-structured and thorough set of security rules for Flask applications. The rules cover a wide range of potential vulnerabilities, including various types of injection attacks (SQL, command, code), cross-site scripting (XSS), server-side request forgery (SSRF), and more.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive coverage of common web application vulnerabilities
- Clear and informative messages for each rule
- Detailed metadata, including CWE and OWASP references
- Use of taint analysis for more accurate detection
- Consideration of various input sources and string formatting methods
To further improve this ruleset, consider the following suggestions:
- Add rules for other common web vulnerabilities, such as Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
- Include rules specific to Flask's security features, such as ensuring proper configuration of
SECRET_KEYand session management.- Create a separate file for general Python security rules that are not specific to Flask, to improve organization and reusability.
- Add rules to detect the use of outdated or insecure cryptographic functions and encourage the use of modern, secure alternatives.
- Consider adding rules to check for proper input validation and output encoding practices throughout the application.
These additions would make the ruleset even more robust and comprehensive for securing Flask applications.
routes/wow.py (3)
110-111: Remove Print Statements Used for DebuggingThe
print(json_data)andprint(response)statements are used for debugging purposes and should be removed or replaced with proper logging before deploying to production.Suggested Fix:
Replace
import logging +logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def petshoppinglist(): # ... - print(json_data) + logger.debug(f"Request payload: {json_data}") # ... - print(response) + logger.debug(f"API response: {response}")Ensure that logging is appropriately configured to handle different log levels.
Also applies to: 118-119
127-127: Remove Unnecessary f-StringAt line 127, the string does not contain placeholders but is prefixed with
f, which is unnecessary.Suggested Fix:
# send generic error message to remove XSS potential -return f"error no matching results found matching search inputs" +return "Error: No matching results found."🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
127-127: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
fprefix(F541)
99-99: Correct Spelling of Deprecated CommentThe comment
# DEPRECIATEDcontains a typo.Suggested Fix:
-# DEPRECIATED +# DEPRECATED
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- .github/bandit-matcher.json (1 hunks)
- .github/black-matcher.json (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/linters.yaml (2 hunks)
- app.py (1 hunks)
- routes/wow.py (1 hunks)
- semgrep.config.yaml (2 hunks)
- templates/petshoppinglist.html (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/bandit-matcher.json
- .github/black-matcher.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/linters.yaml
[error] 40-40: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🪛 Ruff
routes/wow.py
127-127: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
fprefix(F541)
🪛 semgrep
routes/wow.py
[WARNING] 125-125: [WARNING] 125-125: Detected Flask route directly returning a formatted string. This is subject to cross-site scripting if user input can reach the string. Consider using the template engine instead and rendering pages with 'render_template()'.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/linters.yaml (2)
23-24: LGTM: Bandit problem matcher integrationThe addition of the Bandit problem matcher is a good improvement. It will enhance the visibility of Bandit's security checks in GitHub's UI, making it easier for developers to identify and address potential security issues.
39-40: Verify the Black matcher JSON file pathThe addition of the Black problem matcher is a good improvement for better integration with GitHub's UI. However, please ensure that the file
.github/black-matcher.jsonexists in your repository. If it doesn't, you'll need to create it with the appropriate problem matcher configuration for Black.To verify the existence of the Black matcher JSON file, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Black matcher JSON file is correctly configured and present.
The
.github/black-matcher.jsonfile exists and contains the appropriate problem matcher configuration for Black.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the Black matcher JSON file exists if [ -f .github/black-matcher.json ]; then echo "Black matcher JSON file exists." else echo "Warning: Black matcher JSON file not found at .github/black-matcher.json" echo "Please ensure you have created this file with the appropriate configuration." fiLength of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the contents of the Black matcher JSON file cat .github/black-matcher.jsonLength of output: 247
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 40-40: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
templates/petshoppinglist.html (1)
51-52: Verify the substantial increase in maxPurchasePriceThe default maxPurchasePrice has been significantly increased from 10,000 to 1,000,000. While this change is consistently reflected in both the input value and the example text, it's crucial to consider the following points:
- Ensure that this new maximum price aligns with the current in-game economy and pet market trends.
- Verify that the backend systems can efficiently handle queries with this expanded price range without performance issues.
- Consider adding a warning or confirmation for users when they input very high values to prevent accidental large purchases.
Please provide more context on the reasoning behind this 100x increase in the maximum purchase price. Additionally, run the following script to check for any related changes in the backend code:
#!/bin/bash # Search for occurrences of both old and new maxPurchasePrice values echo "Occurrences of old maxPurchasePrice (10000):" rg --type html --type python "10000" echo "Occurrences of new maxPurchasePrice (1000000):" rg --type html --type python "1000000" # Check for any changes in price-related logic echo "Recent changes in files containing price-related logic:" git diff HEAD~5 HEAD -- $(rg -l "price|cost|gold" --type python)routes/wow.py (1)
107-107: Verify the Use of Empty Dictionary forconnectedRealmIDsCurrently,
connectedRealmIDsis set to an empty dictionary{}. Ensure that this is the intended behavior and that the API can handle an empty dictionary for this parameter.Verification Script:
| <input name="petID" type="number" class="form-control" value="223144"> | ||
| <div class="form-text"> | ||
| <a href="/itemnames" target="_blank">This list shows all itemIDs or petIDs you can pick from </a>. | ||
| ex: <span style="color: #d97e84;">3390</span>. | ||
| ex: <span style="color: #d97e84;">223144</span>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Old petID (3390) still present in other files
The old petID value "3390" is still present in the file templates/petexport.html. To ensure consistency across the codebase, please verify whether this petID should also be updated or if it serves a specific purpose.
- File:
templates/petexport.html- Occurrences: Multiple instances of "3390"
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the significant change in petID value
The default petID value has been changed from 3390 to 223144, which is a substantial increase. While this change is consistently reflected in both the input value and the example text, it's important to ensure that:
- This new petID is valid and represents a commonly searched or representative pet.
- The change doesn't negatively impact existing users who might be familiar with the old value.
- The backend systems are prepared to handle this new range of petID values.
Could you provide more context on why this specific petID was chosen? Also, please run the following script to check if this petID is used consistently across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for occurrences of both old and new petID values
echo "Occurrences of old petID (3390):"
rg --type html --type python "3390"
echo "Occurrences of new petID (223144):"
rg --type html --type python "223144"
Length of output: 289
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for occurrences of both old and new petID values with correct file types
echo "Occurrences of old petID (3390):"
rg --type html --type py "3390"
echo "Occurrences of new petID (223144):"
rg --type html --type py "223144"
Length of output: 667
routes/wow.py
Outdated
| @wow_bp.route("/petshoppinglist", methods=["GET", "POST"]) | ||
| def petshoppinglist(): | ||
| # return redirect("https://saddlebagexchange.com/wow/shopping-list") | ||
|
|
||
| # DEPRECIATED | ||
| if request.method == "GET": | ||
| return return_safe_html(render_template("petshoppinglist.html")) | ||
| elif request.method == "POST": | ||
| json_data = { | ||
| "region": request.form.get("region"), | ||
| "itemID": int(request.form.get("petID")), | ||
| "maxPurchasePrice": int(request.form.get("maxPurchasePrice")), | ||
| "connectedRealmIDs": {}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| print(json_data) | ||
|
|
||
| response = requests.post( | ||
| f"{api_url}/wow/shoppinglistx", | ||
| headers={"Accept": "application/json"}, | ||
| json=json_data, | ||
| ).json() | ||
|
|
||
| print(response) | ||
|
|
||
| if "data" not in response: | ||
| print( | ||
| f"Error no matching data with given inputs {json_data} response {response}" | ||
| ) | ||
| if NO_RATE_LIMIT: | ||
| return f"Error no matching data with given inputs {json_data} response {response}" | ||
| # send generic error message to remove XSS potential | ||
| return f"error no matching results found matching search inputs" | ||
|
|
||
| response = response["data"] | ||
|
|
||
| column_order = [ | ||
| "realmID", | ||
| "price", | ||
| "quantity", | ||
| "realmName", | ||
| "realmNames", | ||
| "link", | ||
| ] | ||
| response = [{key: item.get(key) for key in column_order} for item in response] | ||
| fieldnames = list(response[0].keys()) | ||
|
|
||
| return return_safe_html( | ||
| render_template( | ||
| "petshoppinglist.html", results=response, fieldnames=fieldnames, len=len | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Error Handling for Invalid Form Inputs
In the petshoppinglist() function, the form inputs petID and maxPurchasePrice are directly converted to integers using int(request.form.get("petID")) and int(request.form.get("maxPurchasePrice")). If these form inputs are missing or contain non-integer values, a ValueError or TypeError could be raised, resulting in a server error.
Suggested Fix:
Add error handling to validate the form inputs before converting them to integers. You can use a try-except block or check if the inputs are digits.
def petshoppinglist():
if request.method == "GET":
return return_safe_html(render_template("petshoppinglist.html"))
elif request.method == "POST":
json_data = {
"region": request.form.get("region"),
- "itemID": int(request.form.get("petID")),
- "maxPurchasePrice": int(request.form.get("maxPurchasePrice")),
+ "itemID": int(request.form.get("petID") or 0),
+ "maxPurchasePrice": int(request.form.get("maxPurchasePrice") or 0),
"connectedRealmIDs": {},
}Alternatively, implement input validation:
def petshoppinglist():
if request.method == "GET":
return return_safe_html(render_template("petshoppinglist.html"))
elif request.method == "POST":
pet_id = request.form.get("petID")
max_price = request.form.get("maxPurchasePrice")
if not pet_id.isdigit() or not max_price.isdigit():
return "Invalid input: petID and maxPurchasePrice must be integers"
json_data = {
"region": request.form.get("region"),
"itemID": int(pet_id),
"maxPurchasePrice": int(max_price),
"connectedRealmIDs": {},
}🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
127-127: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
fprefix(F541)
🪛 semgrep
[WARNING] 125-125: [WARNING] 125-125: Detected Flask route directly returning a formatted string. This is subject to cross-site scripting if user input can reach the string. Consider using the template engine instead and rendering pages with 'render_template()'.
routes/wow.py
Outdated
| "link", | ||
| ] | ||
| response = [{key: item.get(key) for key in column_order} for item in response] | ||
| fieldnames = list(response[0].keys()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle Potential IndexError When Accessing Response Data
When accessing response[0] to get the field names, there is a potential for an IndexError if the response is an empty list.
Suggested Fix:
Add a check to ensure that response is not empty before accessing response[0].
if not response:
return "Error: No data available."
fieldnames = list(response[0].keys())
routes/wow.py
Outdated
| f"Error no matching data with given inputs {json_data} response {response}" | ||
| ) | ||
| if NO_RATE_LIMIT: | ||
| return f"Error no matching data with given inputs {json_data} response {response}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid Returning Formatted Strings Directly in Routes
Returning formatted strings directly can lead to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities if user input is included. Consider using render_template() to return HTML responses.
This aligns with the static analysis warning:
Detected Flask route directly returning a formatted string. This is subject to cross-site scripting if user input can reach the string. Consider using the template engine instead and rendering pages with
render_template().
Suggested Fix:
Use render_template() or a safe response method.
if NO_RATE_LIMIT:
- return "Error: No matching data found for the given inputs."
+ return render_template("error.html", message="No matching data found for the given inputs.")Ensure that the error.html template is properly set up to display the error message safely.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 semgrep
[WARNING] 125-125: [WARNING] 125-125: Detected Flask route directly returning a formatted string. This is subject to cross-site scripting if user input can reach the string. Consider using the template engine instead and rendering pages with 'render_template()'.
routes/wow.py
Outdated
| print( | ||
| f"Error no matching data with given inputs {json_data} response {response}" | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prevent Potential Information Disclosure in Error Messages
Returning detailed error messages containing json_data and response can expose sensitive information and lead to security vulnerabilities such as information disclosure.
Suggested Fix:
Modify the error handling to return a generic error message without including the request or response data.
if "data" not in response:
print(
f"Error no matching data with given inputs {json_data} response {response}"
)
if NO_RATE_LIMIT:
- return f"Error no matching data with given inputs {json_data} response {response}"
+ return "Error: No matching data found for the given inputs."
# send generic error message to remove XSS potential
- return f"error no matching results found matching search inputs"
+ return "Error: No matching results found."Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/linters.yaml (2)
37-39: Approve changes and suggest improvementThe addition of the Black problem matcher is a great improvement for visibility of formatting issues in the GitHub UI. The
continue-on-error: truesetting is less risky for Black than for Bandit, as formatting issues don't pose security risks.To further improve the workflow, consider adding a step to automatically apply Black formatting and commit the changes. This can help maintain consistent code style without manual intervention.
Here's a suggested implementation to automatically apply Black formatting:
- name: Run black run: | black . git config --local user.email "action@github.com" git config --local user.name "GitHub Action" git commit -am "Apply Black formatting" || echo "No changes to commit" git pushThis step would run after the current Black check step. It applies Black formatting, commits the changes if any, and pushes them to the repository.
Also applies to: 42-42
42-42: Add a newline at the end of the fileThe static analysis tool yamllint has reported that there's no newline character at the end of the file. While this is a minor issue, it's generally good practice to end files with a newline. This can prevent issues with certain tools and makes concatenating files easier.
Please add a newline at the end of the file:
run: black --check . continue-on-error: true # Allow this step to fail but continue +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 42-42: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/linters.yaml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/linters.yaml
[error] 42-42: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/linters.yaml (1)
17-19: Approve changes with a note oncontinue-on-errorThe addition of the Bandit problem matcher is a great improvement for visibility of security issues in the GitHub UI.
However, be cautious with the
continue-on-error: truesetting. While it allows the workflow to continue even if Bandit finds issues, it might lead to security vulnerabilities being overlooked if not properly addressed. Ensure that there's a process in place to review and address all Bandit findings, even if the job doesn't fail the overall workflow.To ensure that Bandit findings are not overlooked, consider adding a step to fail the workflow if high-severity issues are found:
Also applies to: 25-25
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
petmarketshareand updated functionality forpetshoppinglist.Bug Fixes
/wowoutofstockroute.Documentation
petshoppinglist.htmltemplate to reflect new defaults.