Skip to content

fix: resolve BTC transfer missing address and amount after scanning(OK-37083) #7030

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

huhuanming
Copy link
Contributor

@huhuanming huhuanming commented Apr 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined the QR code scanning process by removing a separate handling path for certain network types, resulting in a more uniform experience when parsing QR codes.

Copy link

codesandbox bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web EditorVS CodeInsiders

Open Preview

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Walkthrough

This change removes a block of code from the useParseQRCode hook that handled special processing for single-token networks. The deleted section checked the network settings, fetched the native token, navigated back, and triggered a modal for signature confirmation. All other QR code parsing logic remains unchanged.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/kit/.../useParseQRCode.tsx Removed the code block for single-token network handling, including API calls (getVaultSettings, getNativeToken), navigation, and modal trigger logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant H as useParseQRCode Hook
    participant API as BackgroundAPIProxy

    U->>H: Initiates QR code scan
    H->>API: Check vault settings for network
    API-->>H: Return settings
    Note over H: Single-token network branch removed
    H->>U: Continue with default QR code processing
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (OK-37083) Addressed Explanation
Auto-populate address and amount when scanning BTC protocol QR codes The change removes single-token logic but does not add functionality for BTC QR code data extraction.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab493b7 and b250c69.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/kit/src/views/ScanQrCode/hooks/useParseQRCode.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/kit/src/views/ScanQrCode/hooks/useParseQRCode.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: lint (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: unittest (20.x)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or Summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@huhuanming huhuanming changed the title fix: resolve BTC transfer missing address and amount after scanning fix: resolve BTC transfer missing address and amount after scanning(OK-37083) Apr 3, 2025
@huhuanming huhuanming enabled auto-merge (squash) April 3, 2025 09:57
@huhuanming huhuanming marked this pull request as draft April 3, 2025 10:19
auto-merge was automatically disabled April 3, 2025 10:19

Pull request was converted to draft

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants