You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following the Westend AHM migration, we’ve identified 35 accounts with incorrect hold entries.
The root cause seems to be accounts that were dual stakers—participating in both direct nomination and nomination pools. Due to a bug where all holds were translated to PreImage, multiple PreImage holds were applied. This unintentionally overwrote prior values instead of stacking the correct hold amounts, resulting in an under-represented total hold.
While the fix extrinsic successfully migrated existing PreImage holds to their correct HoldReason, it did not reapply any missing amounts. These accounts are still in a broken state.
We need to explore how to fix these remaining accounts.
Following the Westend AHM migration, we’ve identified 35 accounts with incorrect hold entries.
The root cause seems to be accounts that were dual stakers—participating in both direct nomination and nomination pools. Due to a bug where all holds were translated to PreImage, multiple PreImage holds were applied. This unintentionally overwrote prior values instead of stacking the correct hold amounts, resulting in an under-represented total hold.
While the fix extrinsic successfully migrated existing PreImage holds to their correct HoldReason, it did not reapply any missing amounts. These accounts are still in a broken state.
We need to explore how to fix these remaining accounts.
Full list:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: