You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/posts/meetup-42-wrapup.md
+1-1
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ can be found here:
21
21
* try to isolate SIMD as much as possible
22
22
23
23
> The difficulty with a general purpose approach to SIMD [...] is that the performance can be dramatically different on
24
-
> different processors. -- [go/issues/53171#issuecomment-1142953120](https://github.com/golang/go/issues/53171#issuecomment-1142953120)
24
+
> different processors. -- [go/issues/53171](https://github.com/golang/go/issues/53171#issuecomment-1142953120)
25
25
26
26
* Go uses its own assembly syntax as an intermediate representation, more on that in [The Design of the Go Assembler](https://go.dev/talks/2016/asm.slide#1) (2016)
27
27
* there are various approaches to SIMD and Go including [avo](https://github.com/mmcloughlin/avo), [gocc](https://github.com/kelindar/gocc), and more - see: [Examples of methods to use SIMD in Go](https://github.com/Crash129/go-simd-example?tab=readme-ov-file#examples-of-methods-to-use-simd-in-go)
0 commit comments