You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
💡 Code pal for ABAP follows the Clean ABAP. If the issue relates to coding style, please submit it here.
Check Name
CX_ROOT Usage Check
Actual Behavior
QATL reports the error "CX_ROOT should not be used!". In the description it instructs to use the pseudo comment “#EC NEED_CX_ROOT if necessary. But there is also a pragma ##CATCH_ALL. Why does QATL not consider the pragma?
Expected Behavior
CodePal should also consider the pragma ##CATCH_ALL.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Code Inspector checks cannot support pragmas, see prior discussion in #337.
In general, it is not recommended to run both the Extended Program Check and the equivalent Code Pal check - it's just redundant and leads to this pragma/pseudo comment confusion. Once the new documentation lands (#571), all checks that have SLIN (or other CI) equivalents will note this explicitly in their documentation.
Check Name
Actual Behavior
Expected Behavior
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: